Magpul Stocks

Another Home Inspector Obsessed with
Why are home inspectors obsessed with

Armalite Inc 2012 Catalog Now Available
http://tiny.cc/dtc4o The new catalog features the latest in ArmaLite’s fine quality firearms and accessories including many new third party items from top level manufacturers like

AR-15 Stock

Here is a link to the EXPS 2. Here is a link to the EXPS 3 Mike @ CST CS Gunworks is now CS TACTICAL.com Http://www.CSTactical.com Http://www.Facebook.com/CSTactical 1-877-288-4137 / 1-916-670-1103 jmh-ar-15 Team Bronze Contributor Team Sep 2010 USA USA 65 : 0-0-0 : Today 4:35:32 Originally By Tomac: Originally By JMP: Originally By PFC_Kramer: save up a little more and just buy a new xps they are light years ahead of the older 51x series and smaller than the 511 Light years ahead? In what way please? I am seriously not good at researching these sights. I have tried and tried… Don’t know if it’s light years ahead, but the XPS series has side control buttons (easier to reach if you’re using rear sights or a magnifier) and the single CR123 battery is transverse-mounted to supposedly solve the reported recoil-induced battery spring compression problem. HTH… Tomac FYI, I recently had this problem with my 512. EOTech was good about working with me to put new springs and contacts in, but I am still not sure if I can depend on it with my life. I really like the EOTech display however. I basically formed some copper in a fashion to wedge between the batteries and contacts, taking the springs out of play. This “fix” will suffice until I can save up the $$$$$ to buy an EXPS.

I was thrilled to open a box to add a 512 I got off EE to my rifle but then had evening ruined due to my astigmatism making the sight look blurry. If I put my contacts in it was much better but the outer ring actually looks like it is on fire(like I see flames rising from it). I don’t want a regular Rifle Scope for the rifle and I am on somewhat of a budget. Can anyone recommend what I can check out for a sight? I honestly thought the site itself had a problem until I realized when I would squint it made things clear up then put contacts in and it made the sight usable. mks99 Caliber doesn’t matter if you can’t shoot… Bronze Contributor Team Oct 2009 USA IL, USA 707 : 0-0-0 : 6/16/2011 8:59:35 You are pretty much stuck.

Shooting Targets
: 0-0-0 : 6/14/2011 4:06:51 Originally By engineer201: The EO tech has a much bigger window and with it the complex reticle which it sounds like you want (the Trijicon has the standard dot). I love the SA that it gives me. This is along the same lines I was thinking. I like the complex reticle, but I like the tritium more, I think. I’d like to not give up either- thus the appeal of the M21. Just not sure of reliability, etc… The Trijicon is small. Depending on what setup you are running, you will need to get some sort of riser to mount the Trijicon on top of if you have an FSB. I have seen the Trijicon best used either mounted on top of an ACOG, mounted on a pistol, or on a bullpup of some sort. What are you intending on putting the optic on as this will help refine the advice? I’ll be mounting it on an Flat-top AR15.

NevadaARshooter

12/1/2005 8:29:36 PM Face_N_The_Crowd: NevadaARshooter: I can’t wait for Armalites new AR10 magazines. Cheers When are these due?
seamasterpro
2/2/2011 11:56:18 PM
I tossed the two around before I bought and ended up with the LT-681 on my A4gery and glad I did. because of the short eye relief of the TA31 I mounted mine really far back, farther than I could have gone with the LT-100. the LT-681 mounts extremely solid so all things being relatively equal I figure you might as well get the one you can Scope Mount furthest rearward and equally as far forward.
flpickupman
2/4/2011 7:01:24 PM

The RCO Scope Mount is going to give you worlds more adjustment for eye relief. Mine has been more than solid. No complaints.
boricua9mm [Member]
2/4/2011 7:30:45 PM
If you want to tuck a BUIS under the ACOG, then go with the LT100. If not, the RCO Scope Mount is a good choice.
socommatthews (West Bridgewater, MA) – The matter of Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v Austin Precision Products, Inc. d/b/a LaRue Tactical, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-10034(DPW), was settled and dismissed with prejudice. LaRue Tactical has taken a fully paid up, royalty free license under U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 3,466,163 and 3,478,909.

Shooting Targets